Content governance

Review Rules

Jobs, case studies, reports, and unsafe content are handled according to authenticity, clarity, compliance, and platform safety rules.

Job review

Jobs should clearly state company context, collaboration type, compensation or budget, responsibilities, requirements, tools, and expected deliverables.
Unclear roles, contradictory fields, fake high compensation, training funnels, illegal work, scams, gray-market activity, or misleading claims can be rejected or removed.
Incomplete or unclear jobs may be returned for edits; high-risk or prohibited content can be removed directly.

Case studies should explain the problem, the Builder's own responsibility, tools used, implementation choices, and outcomes.
Unclear role boundaries, exaggerated outcomes, copied work, confidential customer data, or misleading claims are common rejection reasons.
When possible, review feedback should point to what needs to be clarified before resubmission.

Users can report fake jobs, fake profiles, suspicious companies, harassment, scams, IP issues, privacy exposure, or risky conversations.
Review can consider page links, screenshots, conversation records, account behavior, prior review history, and other available evidence.
Insufficient evidence may lead to a request for more materials; clear high-risk evidence can lead to removal, account limits, or further action.

Illegal content, scams, gray-market work, fake high compensation, pay-to-work schemes, harassment, discrimination, stolen cases, and privacy leaks may be restricted or removed.
Minor issues may be returned for edits; repeated violations, evasion, or high-risk content can lead to direct removal or account restrictions.
For severe risk, platform actions prioritize user data protection and communication safety.

Read the notice first, then return to the right dashboard to edit or add evidence.

Return to the jobs dashboard, read the review note, edit the job, and resubmit where allowed.

Return to case studies, read the review note, and clarify role boundaries, tools, and outcomes.

Reporters should add evidence when asked. Actioned users should follow the notice or contact support.

Preparing the latest content.